Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides the user some extra features. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is a lot newer than Galaxy Note 5's, although it is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a way less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs a little more money than the Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.