Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some additional features. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than the Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 5 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Note 5. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note 5, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.