Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's just a bit thinner and incredibly newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.