Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5, having an 84.5 score against 79.3. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a a lot newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has 14 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much better display than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi 14T Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.