Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blasting black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and way thicker than Galaxy Note 5.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a lot more mega pixels camera, faster video frame rates and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.