Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with an 87.9 score against 79.3. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a more recent 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a lot higher video quality, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.