Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a general score of 87.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Xiaomi Poco F3's construction is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a much larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.