Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than Galaxy Note 5, getting an 87.5 score against 79.3. The Xiaomi Poco F4 body has the same thickness than Galaxy Note 5, but it's somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F4 has a newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F4 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.