Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has an overall score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's design is much newer than Galaxy Note 5's, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Note 5 has a much powerful processor than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM memory. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 5 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a way less MP resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.