Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an extremely older device than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.