Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a score of 83.4 against 79.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro body is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it's somewhat thicker and way heavier.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 72% bigger battery size. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.