Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a general score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Although it's the best in this review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a thicker and heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.