Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a 79.3 score against 77.1. The Galaxy Note 5 design is just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a much better resolution camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.