Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 general score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations and a lot higher 200 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.