Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has an overall score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving you a couple nice extra features. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a bit thicker than Galaxy Note 5, it's notably lighter and also extremely newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2710px and a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has lesser processing cores and 4 GB less RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 70 percent greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.