Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 11, having a 79.3 score against 76. Even though the Galaxy Note 5 is much older and a bit heavier than ZTE Axon 11, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10 version.
ZTE Axon 11 features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen density.
ZTE Axon 11 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The ZTE Axon 11 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 shoots a bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.