Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 79.3 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 body is a little lighter and a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen density.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with way more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.