Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Edge's overall score of 81.7. Google Pixel 4's construction is incredibly newer, a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy Note Edge. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has a sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel amount in each inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note Edge shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note Edge features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. Galaxy Note Edge counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a little more than the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.