Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge's 81.7 general score. The Google Pixel 4a is a extremely newer device, and it's also a little bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy Note Edge has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy Note Edge has a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit greater pixel count in each screen inch.
Google Pixel 4a features much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 5% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a much tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4a costs a little more money than Galaxy Note Edge, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.