Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 81.7. LG Velvet's construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge. The Galaxy Note Edge counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG Velvet features a better camera than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger aperture and a camera with a much higher resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.