Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's general score of 80.4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is also incredibly heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a better processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a greater amount of RAM.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower 1284 x 2778 resolution and a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has better video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4352mAh battery size.
IPhone 13 Pro Max costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.