Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Space Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D, with a score of 80.4 against 79.8. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition body is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than Asus ROG Phone 6D, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better performing processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 6D, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2448px resolution and a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen. The Asus ROG Phone 6D captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.