Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Space Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 83.2 score against 80.4. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate design is way newer, but extremely heavier and noticeably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a way better hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features just a bit better display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2448 pixels and a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.