Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's general score of 80.4. The Google Pixel 4 is a noticeably newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is also just a little thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a just a bit greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Google Pixel 4 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a back-facing camera with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.