Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a global score of 89 against 80.4. The Google Pixel 5 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both of them are equally thin. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with higher video frame rate and a back facing camera with more megapixels.
Google Pixel 5 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 5 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.