Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a general score of 82.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's general score of 80.4. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a a lot thinner and extremely lighter phone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot higher screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a camera with a much better resolution and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.