Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a lighter device than Honor 50 Pro, but they have the same thickness. The Honor 50 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better looking display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little better screen pixel density. Honor 50 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Honor 50 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Honor 50 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.