Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-07-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 81 score against 80.4. The LG G7 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter phone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The LG G7 ThinQ has a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of screen, a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
LG G7 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.