Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a global score of 85.4 against 80.4. Even though LG K92 is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG K92 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG K92 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The LG K92 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The LG K92 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.