Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a overall score of 87.6 against 80.4. LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per display inch. The LG V60 ThinQ features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution. LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.