Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's score of 80.4. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM. LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
LG Velvet has a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
LG Velvet counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.