Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and Forged Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Motorola Defy (2021), with an 80.4 score against 77.2. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older cellphone than Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung was able to build it notably thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a better screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Defy (2021). Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Defy (2021) shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way more mega-pixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor.
The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.