Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 86.1 score against 80.4. Motorola Edge 20 is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 20 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.