Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a score of 87.1 against 80.4. Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a much newer phone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is a little heavier and a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with better 120 fps video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.