Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a 92.8 score against 80.4. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels number in each screen inch.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a way better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.