Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a general score of 80.4 against 78.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a lot older and just a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's construction is still just a little lighter. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 38% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.