Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a overall score of 80.9 against 80.4. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.