Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 81.9 score against 80.4. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is newer, but just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 50 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.