Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G has an overall score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. Although the Motorola Moto G 5G is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's noticeably thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The Moto G 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Moto G 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Moto G 5G has a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.