Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better processing power than Moto G Power. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Moto G Power captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way better 16 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Power counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.