Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), getting an 80.4 score against 76.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), even though it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better performance than Moto G Power (2021). They have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Moto G Power (2021) has a little bit more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has faster video frame rates, a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.