Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), getting an 80.4 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an older cellphone than Moto G Stylus (2021), but Samsung made it much lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much more megapixels back camera. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Stylus (2021), giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.