Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with an 80.4 score against 76. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a very superior processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels density. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low-light situations and a way smaller sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.