Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G100 has a score of 88.9, which is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's score of 80.4. The Motorola Moto G100 body is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Motorola Moto G100 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G100 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid screen than Moto G100, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto G100 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G100 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto G100 also has a much better video resolution, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a much better resolution back camera.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.