Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 86.2 score against 80.4. Although the Moto G200 5G is way newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Moto G200 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Moto G200 5G has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.