Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60's 79.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an much older phone than Motorola Moto G60, but it is incredibly lighter and way thinner anyway. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G60 has a CPU that is very similar to Galaxy Note Fan Edition's processor, both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto G60 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Moto G60 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.