Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, getting an 80.4 score against 77.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto G8 Plus has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G8 Plus also has a camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Plus has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.