Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G84 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 80.9 score against 80.4. The Motorola Moto G84 design is way newer, a little thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much more powerful processing unit than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G84 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G84 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Motorola Moto G84 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.