Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is slightly better than Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older device than the Moto G9 Play, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a better display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Moto G9 Play has a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger sensor and a way higher resolution back camera.
Moto G9 Play features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G9 Play also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Play features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.