Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a global score of 80.5 against 80.4. Motorola Moto G9 Plus is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's thicker and notably heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little better processing power than Moto G9 Plus. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Moto G9 Plus captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G9 Plus counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.